peer review

The new study suggests implementing a double-blind review process to help mitigate biases

Preprint findings aren’t final, and publicizing their results may cause distrust in science

Contributors now earn PeerJ Tokens for reviewing and editing submissions to PeerJ journals

New studies find that majority of preprints are reliable and trustworthy

All IOPP open access journals to have transparent peer review starting in February

Recent COVID-19 studies ranked by reviewers as either strong, reliable, potentially informative, not informative, or misleading

Researchers find ways to modernize time-intensive process that plagues many academics

Research team points out how bureaucratic inefficiency can be likened to that of the peer-review process associated with academic research in the health sciences

The researchers emphasize that, with billions of dollars at stake, additional research is needed on this vital system of funding and any potential improvements to the process

Funding mechanism no better than random for choosing projects that will produce most-cited science, analysis suggests